Female Hamlets, East and West

Another repost. I just like this bit that I wrote.

The keys to the kingdom have finally been given to the women. At the Stratford Shakespeare Festival, Seana McKenna prepares for her turn as the titular role in the Festival's upcoming production of Richard III. At the Royal Shakespeare Company, Kathryn Hunter plays Cleopatra, having just finished King Lear, not as the King this time but as the Fool. Meanwhile, Helen Mirren has wrapped up filming The Tempest, her Prospera hot on the heels of Christopher Plummer's Prospero.

Hardly a new phenomenon (the first two Hamlets on film, Sarah Bernhardt and Asta Nielsen, were both female), Shakespeare's greatest tragic roles have become fame for women as well as men. There's yet to be a mainstream female Romeo outside of opera (Bellini's Il Montecchi e Capuletti comes to mind), but the convention of the 'trousers role' has finally transcended its reputation as a novelty act and has gained prestige. An inversion of the Shakespearean practice of male players, gender-neutral casting does not seem so unnatural to the actresses who benefit from it.

Branagh's Hamlet, And Why It Sucks

Kenneth Branagh has always been a bit of a cipher to me, at least in terms of his work. Some of his movies are awesome, like Henry V, Much Ado About Nothing, and Thor. Others are too far out in Cloudcuckooland for me to even begin to comprehend, like As You Like It and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. His acting is much the same; I love him in Wallander, Henry V, and Harry Potter, but loathe him in Wild Wild West and Othello. He is a polarizing figure, mostly because there is no such thing as a mediocre movie with him; he is either outrageously bad or outrageously good.

His Hamlet (1996) appears to be an amalgam of the man. There are parts I like, and then there are parts I hate. The difference between him and the film is that the parts I hate in the film outweigh what I don't by a good bit.